Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [gentoo-nfp] Foundation meeting agenda for April 2018 - update1
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 05:28:56
Message-Id: 23253.34320.31625.212017@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] [gentoo-nfp] Foundation meeting agenda for April 2018 - update1 by Matthew Thode
1 >>>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, Matthew Thode wrote:
2
3 > What I'd like to see (not fully thought out and all) is the
4 > following.
5
6 > CoC is not enforced on the list by comrel, but comrel can report
7 > what they beleive to be CoC violations to the Trustees. The Trustees
8 > can take action if they believe necessary.
9
10 I don't think that adding a further indirection for disciplinary
11 measures would be helpful. At the least, it would delay any actions.
12 So, I would suggest to leave this to ComRel, and if you absolutely
13 must, make trustees rather then council the instance of appeal for the
14 gentoo-nfp list.
15
16 Ulrich (not speaking for the council)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] [gentoo-nfp] Foundation meeting agenda for April 2018 - update1 Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com>