| 1 |
Personally I think comrel SHOULD be an arm of the foundation, as it's |
| 2 |
an HR function. For much the same reason as I think that infra should |
| 3 |
also be an arm of the foundation, that and the fact that infra is |
| 4 |
managing hardware owned by the foundation itself. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> wrote: |
| 7 |
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> |
| 8 |
> wrote: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> I could, but 1) this is clearly the official list of the Gentoo Foundation |
| 12 |
>> 2) ComRel has no authority over members. It is run by Council, which is a |
| 13 |
>> developer-focused organization 3) Foundation is in control of Gentoo |
| 14 |
>> infrastructure, not Council 4) ComRel is clearly acting out of its authority |
| 15 |
>> by policing this list and banning the Foundation and project founder as well |
| 16 |
>> as former trustees. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> by "out of its authority" I mean "beyond the scope of its authority." If I |
| 19 |
> am being disruptive to the Foundation and the trustees, the Foundation |
| 20 |
> itself can contact me regarding this. Not ComRel. It is not an arm of the |
| 21 |
> Foundation. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -Daniel |
Archives