Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Re: reopen nominations
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 01:30:38
Message-Id: CA+CSuAKM7xFz-MvKFmJLmf3xbeRaa7xwD_vTHzvdDaM16GKaKw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-nfp] Re: reopen nominations by "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto"
1 On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2 <jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote:
3 > we haven't had too many candidates
4
5 What does that have to do with candidates not being suitable for the
6 position they're trying to be elected for?
7
8 To sum up, we're forced to vote for candidates we don't want to vote
9 for because there's no way we can not vote for them, and not voting is
10 also not an option since if we don't vote twice in a row we lose our
11 foundation membership. If it has to be a rigged election I'd rather
12 not be forced to approve of it.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Re: reopen nominations Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Re: reopen nominations Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o>