1 |
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:38 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: |
2 |
> 1) just to be sure, did someone check the transfer agreement between the |
3 |
> Foundation and the old Gentoo, Inc for potential problems? |
4 |
|
5 |
We have not done this yet and actually didn't even think about it, so |
6 |
thanks for bringing it up. |
7 |
|
8 |
> 2) what would this mean for our copyright situation? In detail: |
9 |
> a) who would (legally) own the copyright? |
10 |
|
11 |
SFC |
12 |
|
13 |
> b) what would (in theory) be involved if we'd want to enforce/change |
14 |
> the license? |
15 |
|
16 |
So long as we fall within the SFC guidelines, we could change the |
17 |
license(s) under which we deliver our software at any time. In other |
18 |
words, a change from GPL-2 to GPL-3 would be possible, but a change from |
19 |
GPL-2 to, say, some proprietary license, would not. |
20 |
|
21 |
> c) if the copyright were owned by the Conservancy, would we have to |
22 |
> change our copyright headers (in existing and/or new files)? |
23 |
|
24 |
Yes |
25 |
|
26 |
> 3) the time it takes to process a funding request worries me a little |
27 |
> bit as well, but then I've never had to deal with that so I'll trust |
28 |
> people who have more experience with that. |
29 |
|
30 |
It takes us damn near forever as it is now. I'm not sure we'd be making |
31 |
the problem worse, and likely would be improving the situation. |
32 |
|
33 |
> 2c) is the thing that concernes me the most, changing all of our |
34 |
> copyright notices would be a huge pain. |
35 |
|
36 |
Actually, it isn't that much of a pain to do in the tree. Where it |
37 |
would be a pain is all the other little spots we have copyright notices |
38 |
that we don't think about that would need to be changed. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Chris Gianelloni |
42 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
43 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
44 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
45 |
Gentoo Foundation |