1 |
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:08:23 -0500 |
2 |
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Ned Ludd wrote: [Mon Jul 16 2007, 04:00:44PM CDT] |
5 |
> > Anyway point I'm trying to make here is that I think we might be |
6 |
> > better off using a 3rd party as our foundation. IE people who have |
7 |
> > the experience/motivation and time to focus on such things |
8 |
> > that a foundation should be. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Anyway. I'd like to nominate nobody in-house. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Yeah, I tend to agree. Not-so-coincidentally, Gentoo's been invited |
13 |
> to join the Software Freedom Conservancy, which would provide just |
14 |
> the sort of 3rd-party management that you're suggesting. I put a |
15 |
> write-up on my blog detailing what we know so far: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> http://www.grantgoodyear.org/g2blog/gentoo/20070717-sflc.html |
18 |
|
19 |
While I think this would be an excellent move, there are a few topics |
20 |
that concern me a bit: |
21 |
1) just to be sure, did someone check the transfer agreement between the |
22 |
Foundation and the old Gentoo, Inc for potential problems? |
23 |
2) what would this mean for our copyright situation? In detail: |
24 |
a) who would (legally) own the copyright? |
25 |
b) what would (in theory) be involved if we'd want to enforce/change |
26 |
the license? |
27 |
c) if the copyright were owned by the Conservancy, would we have to |
28 |
change our copyright headers (in existing and/or new files)? |
29 |
3) the time it takes to process a funding request worries me a little |
30 |
bit as well, but then I've never had to deal with that so I'll trust |
31 |
people who have more experience with that. |
32 |
|
33 |
2c) is the thing that concernes me the most, changing all of our |
34 |
copyright notices would be a huge pain. |
35 |
|
36 |
Btw, you should probably make a new topic for that so people actually |
37 |
notice it. |
38 |
|
39 |
Marius |
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list |