| 1 |
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 4:40 AM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Hello, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I would like to officially request Trustees to *finally* give some |
| 6 |
> answers to the agenda items I've submitted twice already: once |
| 7 |
> in June (as separate topics, linked in [1]), and again in September [1]. |
| 8 |
> I don't see any trace of those topics in meeting logs. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Furthermore, I would like to request update on the topic of removing |
| 11 |
> birth dates from LDAP which was raised multiple times. It has been |
| 12 |
> on the agenda until August [2] and it has suddenly disappeared from it |
| 13 |
> in September [3]. I can't find any talk on the topic in meeting logs |
| 14 |
> later than April where it boiled down to 'no updates'. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I can understand not willing to address Bylaw updates just before |
| 17 |
> the elections. However, we are already half a year past the elections, |
| 18 |
> and Trustees didn't even bother acknowledging the topics. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> [1]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-nfp/message/cb00af13b95e3c309a405f8508ae01b9 |
| 21 |
> [2]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Foundation:Meetings/2018/08 |
| 22 |
> [3]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Foundation:Meetings/2018/09 |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I would concur with these issues, and further cite them as additional |
| 25 |
reasons to prioritize regular meetings. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
The poll sent by antarus is a commendable step in this direction in my |
| 28 |
opinion. I would however encourage a sense of urgency in getting |
| 29 |
these meetings organized as they appear to be blockers for important |
| 30 |
issues. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> Best regards, |
| 34 |
> Michał Górny |
Archives