1 |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:21 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. |
2 |
<wlt@××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 18:35 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
4 |
> I do not hold any future board accountable for mistakes of the past. But |
5 |
> I do look to any current board to correct any mistakes of the past. Such |
6 |
> that they do not exist in the present. |
7 |
|
8 |
Sure, we're agreed. My point is only that just as a CPA can only work |
9 |
with what they're given, the trustees can only work with what they've |
10 |
inherited. First priority needs to be moving forward, and then as we |
11 |
are able we can try to clean up the past. We just have to do what we |
12 |
can. |
13 |
|
14 |
> Your cool, no worries. I was just making a point there, using you as an |
15 |
> example, sorry about that. |
16 |
|
17 |
So, I think the issue here is that we're over-personalizing things. I |
18 |
think we need to step back. |
19 |
|
20 |
Let's give the trustees a little time to respond, because honestly all |
21 |
we can really add to this is speculation. Unless there is a good |
22 |
reason not to, we really should try to make filings public. That |
23 |
really can be as simple as a scanned PDF on a website or something - |
24 |
there is no need to go crazy with GuideXML making it look pretty |
25 |
(though that doesn't hurt). If there are reasons not to make that |
26 |
public then I'm certainly all ears, although at least the New Mexico |
27 |
annual report form looks to be pretty innocuous. |
28 |
|
29 |
Rich |