Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Bylaw proposal: Amend Section 4.3. Admission of Members: automatic developer membership
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 19:21:42
Message-Id: 4eb73a40-45ed-5dd9-e095-1ec4c60477b3@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-nfp] Bylaw proposal: Amend Section 4.3. Admission of Members: automatic developer membership by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On 10/13/2016 02:17 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2 > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:16:48AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
3 >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
4 >>> TL;DR: move comrel, infra, PR to Foundation. Have strict(er) application
5 >>> of policies to them in line with their powers.
6 >> 1. I don't think we ought to be giving more power to the Foundation
7 >> until the Foundation membership is re-aligned with the distro
8 >> developer membership. We essentially have two democratic
9 >> organizations with overlapping but different constituencies, and I'm
10 >> not sure Gentoo could survive if they start trying to pull the distro
11 >> in different directions since the community seems like it is barely
12 >> above critical mass as it is.
13 > Should we amend the bylaws such that all active developers are
14 > automatically members of the Foundation, without specifically applying?
15 > Thereafter, on developer retirement, failing to cast a vote in two
16 > consecutive elections will end their membership.
17 > Non-developers can still apply as before.
18 >
19
20 The problem with this is that the current bylaws states that we need
21 quorum (defined as 1/3 turnout) to have a valid vote. If we don't
22 require voting we might loose that. (unless we want to do away with that)
23
24 --
25 -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies