| 1 |
Well said Roy! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> On 2012.09.28 18:44, wbrana wrote: |
| 5 |
>> > Feel free to discuss revenue ideas on gentoo-nfp <at> |
| 6 |
>> lists.gentoo.org |
| 7 |
>> *.gentoo.org pages could contain ads from DoubleClick |
| 8 |
>> http://www.google.com/doubleclick/, which is used by e.g. Phoronix, |
| 9 |
>> to |
| 10 |
>> get more money which can be used for e.g. bug bounties. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> wbrana, |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> It isn't going to happen. One of the attractive features of the |
| 17 |
> gentoo.org namespace is its complete lack of advertising, unless you |
| 18 |
> call acknowledging major sponsors in the side bar advertising. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> The trustees of the Gentoo Foundation Inc., have balloted members in |
| 21 |
> the past about accepting advertising from large users of Gentoo. The |
| 22 |
> trustees obtained a mandate for this. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Gentoo has existed since October 4 1999 with the present funding model |
| 25 |
> and it seem to work for Gentoo. To have double click advertising the |
| 26 |
> Trustees would need to go back to the members for a new mandate. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> I for one would vote no as I don't want to see the gentoo.org namespace |
| 29 |
> defaced by intrusive advertising while Gentoo has nothing to gain. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> -- |
| 32 |
> Regards, |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Roy Bamford |
| 35 |
> (Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 36 |
> elections |
| 37 |
> gentoo-ops |
| 38 |
> forum-mods |
| 39 |
> trustees |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
Ioannis Aslanidis |
Archives