1 |
On 18-04-10 12:04:33, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Gentoo is a product, the Gentoo Foundation is a business. There are |
7 |
> > many volunteer run orgs that are businesses. Maybe it's not the same |
8 |
> > world wide? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Careful here. "Business" generally means a for-profit entity and in this |
12 |
> sense the Foundation is *not* a business. It is a not-for-profit |
13 |
> corporation, run by trustees, elected by members. As a corporation, it has |
14 |
> similar legal standing as a for-profit company, but operates with a |
15 |
> different goal. Maybe this is what you meant. |
16 |
|
17 |
Thanks, guess I used the wrong word there, that is what I meant. |
18 |
|
19 |
> |
20 |
> Its goal is not profit or to market a "product". Gentoo Linux is not a |
21 |
> "product" and the scope of the Foundation does not need to be limited |
22 |
> purely to Gentoo Linux, although clearly, this is the primary means of |
23 |
> achieving its purpose. |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
Sure, I wasn't intending to limit us to just gentoo linux, it was one of |
27 |
many. |
28 |
|
29 |
> The Foundation does have a purpose, and that mission is to advance |
30 |
> understanding and education of software technology, primarily via the |
31 |
> open/free nature of Gentoo Linux, providing the public with control of and |
32 |
> insight into the software they use, and source code. This is its mission, |
33 |
> to serve the public in this way. There appears to be confusion regarding |
34 |
> this mission. Think of all you have learned from being part of Gentoo, |
35 |
> thanks to the nature of free software, and how many users have more |
36 |
> influence/control over the software they run, due to giving them insight |
37 |
> into how their technology works -- via USE variables, building from source, |
38 |
> etc. These are all ways that Gentoo has allowed people to learn about |
39 |
> technology and be active participants in their software ecosystem, rather |
40 |
> than just being passive consumers of something someone else created. |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
Not here to debate that, but nice info in any case. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |