1 |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Gentoo is a product, the Gentoo Foundation is a business. There are |
6 |
> many volunteer run orgs that are businesses. Maybe it's not the same |
7 |
> world wide? |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
Careful here. "Business" generally means a for-profit entity and in this |
11 |
sense the Foundation is *not* a business. It is a not-for-profit |
12 |
corporation, run by trustees, elected by members. As a corporation, it has |
13 |
similar legal standing as a for-profit company, but operates with a |
14 |
different goal. Maybe this is what you meant. |
15 |
|
16 |
Its goal is not profit or to market a "product". Gentoo Linux is not a |
17 |
"product" and the scope of the Foundation does not need to be limited |
18 |
purely to Gentoo Linux, although clearly, this is the primary means of |
19 |
achieving its purpose. |
20 |
|
21 |
The Foundation does have a purpose, and that mission is to advance |
22 |
understanding and education of software technology, primarily via the |
23 |
open/free nature of Gentoo Linux, providing the public with control of and |
24 |
insight into the software they use, and source code. This is its mission, |
25 |
to serve the public in this way. There appears to be confusion regarding |
26 |
this mission. Think of all you have learned from being part of Gentoo, |
27 |
thanks to the nature of free software, and how many users have more |
28 |
influence/control over the software they run, due to giving them insight |
29 |
into how their technology works -- via USE variables, building from source, |
30 |
etc. These are all ways that Gentoo has allowed people to learn about |
31 |
technology and be active participants in their software ecosystem, rather |
32 |
than just being passive consumers of something someone else created. |
33 |
|
34 |
Best, |
35 |
|
36 |
-Daniel |