| 1 |
On Sun, 2019-07-14 at 12:32 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 05:24:16PM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 2019.07.14 15:40, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
| 4 |
> > [snip] |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > > This can be fixed by proper by-laws, ... |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > [snip] |
| 9 |
> > > -- |
| 10 |
> > > Cheers, |
| 11 |
> > > Aaron |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > That's over simplification. For things to get fixed, |
| 15 |
> > people have to do stuff. By-laws don't ensure |
| 16 |
> > anything gets done. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > -- |
| 19 |
> > Regards, |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > Roy Bamford |
| 22 |
> > (Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 23 |
> > elections |
| 24 |
> > gentoo-ops |
| 25 |
> > forum-mods |
| 26 |
> > arm64 |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> You are correct. It alone does not "fix it", but it does hold the board in |
| 29 |
> violation of retaining one. Which in turn means Section 5.6 comes into play for |
| 30 |
> the general membership. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> As other comments I have made stated, by-laws govern the trustees just as much |
| 33 |
> as the general membership. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
No offense meant but reading your posts, I start feeling like your |
| 37 |
solution to all the problems boils down to 'force Trustees to fix them, |
| 38 |
and if they don't, then force them more'. I'm not yet sure if this |
| 39 |
involves pursuing legal responsibility on past Trustees (i.e. punishing |
| 40 |
them for trying to fix stuff but being unable to fix it entirely), or |
| 41 |
just pursuing current Trustees to the point that nobody will stand for |
| 42 |
elections. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
Best regards, |
| 46 |
Michał Górny |
Archives