| 1 |
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 05:24:16PM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2019.07.14 15:40, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
| 3 |
> [snip] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > This can be fixed by proper by-laws, ... |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> [snip] |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > -- |
| 11 |
> > Cheers, |
| 12 |
> > Aaron |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> That's over simplification. For things to get fixed, |
| 16 |
> people have to do stuff. By-laws don't ensure |
| 17 |
> anything gets done. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> -- |
| 20 |
> Regards, |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Roy Bamford |
| 23 |
> (Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 24 |
> elections |
| 25 |
> gentoo-ops |
| 26 |
> forum-mods |
| 27 |
> arm64 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
You are correct. It alone does not "fix it", but it does hold the board in |
| 30 |
violation of retaining one. Which in turn means Section 5.6 comes into play for |
| 31 |
the general membership. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
As other comments I have made stated, by-laws govern the trustees just as much |
| 34 |
as the general membership. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
No different than if an umbrella fails to file said taxes :) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Cheers, |
| 41 |
Aaron |
Archives