1 |
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 11:27 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
2 |
> that we can earn interest. In my opinion, the first item on the agenda |
3 |
> should be our infrastructure. What's needed, and what can we |
4 |
> legitimately provide? Certainly I would think we should be able to |
5 |
> afford spare drives, but I'm sure that there's more that we need. |
6 |
> Should we just have an annual budget for infra, and let them make the |
7 |
> decisions? That's probably what I would prefer. |
8 |
|
9 |
I think an annual budget would be good, but it might add extra overhead |
10 |
to the infra team, since we would need accurate accounting of what |
11 |
exactly they're spending the money on. If they're cool with that extra |
12 |
work, then I'd see no reason for *not* doing it. |
13 |
|
14 |
I'd like to suggest that we invest in some developer hardware. We have |
15 |
some very nice developer boxes available for many architectures, |
16 |
provided by both our sponsors and developers. What we do *not* have is |
17 |
a beefy "x86" developer box for people to bang on. This is actually a |
18 |
requirement for being a "supported" architecture, and unless we can get |
19 |
a nice box donated for this cause, I'd say it would be money well spent |
20 |
from the Foundation. |
21 |
|
22 |
> The store has been oursourced to cafepress, and is mostly running |
23 |
> itself. It would be good to have a trustee (and a backup) dedicated to |
24 |
> handling store issues; anybody want to volunteer? So far we've been |
25 |
> informally answering e-mails as they come along. |
26 |
|
27 |
One quick question on this. Where's 2005.1? The longer the delay from |
28 |
release to store availability, the less likely it is to generate revenue |
29 |
for the Foundation. Does this stuff *need* to come from a trustee, or |
30 |
could someone else send in the release media to Cafepress? |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Chris Gianelloni |
34 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
35 |
Games - Developer |
36 |
Gentoo Linux |