1 |
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 04:01:46PM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 11:54:48AM -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
3 |
> > > No. It isn't, because it would simply be a partial repeat of the |
4 |
> > > previous section, 6.4 "election and term", which contains: |
5 |
> > In context, my point here is that the general membership should have the ability |
6 |
> > to remove a trustee or the entire board, if so desired. I was not intending to |
7 |
> > be precise or definitive in the semantics. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Simply: The general membership ought to have a mechanism to remove the entire |
10 |
> > board, a single trustee, etc. |
11 |
> Why do you act like there isn't already such a mechanism to remove one |
12 |
> or more trustees? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Section 5.6. Resignation and Removal of Trustees |
15 |
> A director may resign at any time upon written request to the |
16 |
> foundation. Furthermore, any director or the entire Board of Trustees |
17 |
> may be removed, with or without cause, by a vote of the majority of the |
18 |
> members entitled to vote for the election of Trustees or as otherwise |
19 |
> provided in the General Foundation Law of the State of New Mexico. |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
Sorry if it seemed like I was ignoring Section 5.6. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Cheers, |
27 |
Aaron |