1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Dan Armak wrote: |
5 |
| As for the NFP, personally I'm less interested in it, because (as Lance |
6 |
| pointed out) it tries to prevent future problems, while the coop |
7 |
addresses |
8 |
| existing ones - lack of funding linked to community feedback in FOSS |
9 |
| development. So I'd like to look at the coop possibilities. |
10 |
|
11 |
the NFP is to solve a long time issue of the constant rumors that the |
12 |
managers are going to run off with Gentoo and turn it into a profitable |
13 |
business. a "Not For Profit" would prevent that (as the name suggests). |
14 |
|
15 |
This problem seems to be a much bigger problem as the lack of funding.. |
16 |
~ because, although a lot of people aren't as vocal as others, many |
17 |
people want to leave if this is not done. whereas they will continue to |
18 |
stick around without funding much like they do now. |
19 |
|
20 |
- -shrug- |
21 |
|
22 |
Cheers! |
23 |
|
24 |
- -- |
25 |
Corey Shields - IU Unix Systems Support Group |
26 |
http://ussg.iu.edu/~cshields |
27 |
|
28 |
My PGP/GPG public encryption key is at: |
29 |
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/~cshields/cshields_pub_key.asc |
30 |
GPG fingerprint: 78A8 E5EB E455 0A90 F392 59BC A6AF F8A3 A304 1453 |
31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
32 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
33 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
34 |
|
35 |
iD8DBQFAfE6dpq/4o6MEFFMRAuY2AJ9/Ib/2cIWqoNpyJsvS6NbivC+FgwCgo8BX |
36 |
e5t07lDxRLs+zzONJUHVUlo= |
37 |
=wvmQ |
38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list |