Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Nominee manifestos?
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:16:25
Message-Id: 20170713121618.061abde457b2d5a20a1a1d79@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Nominee manifestos? by Roy Bamford
1 On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:05:23 +0100 Roy Bamford wrote:
2 [...]
3 > > Why stop at five when the Council consists of seven members? Three
4 > > seats
5 > > changed for 2017-2018. I took the time to dig up past election results
6 > > and indicated the change between each year. [1, also attached] The
7 > > last
8 > > time 3 or more seats changed was in the 2013-2014 election. To me,
9 > > that's significant enough to claim that there is movement within
10 > > Gentoo,
11 > > especially considering last year's election had no change in seats.
12 > > Before that (2015-2016) was 2 seats, and before that (2014-2015), only
13 > > one.
14 > >
15 > > [1]: https://dev.gentoo.org/~zlg/election-results.txt
16 > > --
17 > > Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer
18 > > OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
19 > > fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6
20 > >
21 >
22 > Daniel,
23 >
24 > A better measure of change might be incumbants unseated.
25 > For example, this year rich0 and blueness did not stand for
26 > reelection, so its not an indicator of change that they were
27 > not reelected.
28
29 The sheer fact that they do not accept nominations induces a
30 change. Yes, reasons for this change is different: acting council
31 members want to step off for their own reasons, but nevertheless
32 this brings new people and a change.
33
34 Best regards,
35 Andrew Savchenko

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Nominee manifestos? Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>