Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Nomination of Alec Warner (antarus) for the Trustee Election
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 20:01:58
Message-Id: /Kd4AFuMpRh4xO5DD7dNwl@tKa6Jo+JPqLVwNeBMIV84
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Nomination of Alec Warner (antarus) for the Trustee Election by Alec Warner
1 On 2018.07.12 19:36, Alec Warner wrote:
2 > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
3 > wrote:
4 >
5 > > On 2018.07.12 14:55, Alec Warner wrote:
6 > > > Yes.
7 > > >
8 > > > I've attached my platform[0] on what I plan to do if elected and
9 > how I
10 > > > plan
11 > > > to vote.
12 > > >
13 > > > -A
14 > > >
15 > > > [0] https://dev.gentoo.org/~antarus/AntarusBoardPlatform.pdf
16 > > >
17 > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Matthew Thode
18 > > > <prometheanfire@g.o>
19 > > > wrote:
20 > > >
21 > > > > Do you accept?
22 > > > >
23 > > > > --
24 > > > > Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
25 > > > >
26 > > >
27 > >
28 > > Fixing things to wind up the Foundation and fixing things to run
29 > > the Foundation is exactly the same work.
30 > >
31 >
32 > I don't think you understand then.
33 >
34 > Previous boards failed to address problems that were IMHO, critical to
35 > the
36 > operation of the foundation. This includes boards that I was on (yay
37 > shame!)
38 >
39 > Sure, we can do a one-time heroic fix of the finances or whatever.
40 > That
41 > will not convince me that people on the board care enough to do a good
42 > job.
43 > The lack of board candidates for election does not convince me the
44 > board
45 > will find qualified candidates to do the work of the board.
46 >
47 > Ultimately I see a few things coming up as useful metrics of a
48 > 'healthy'
49 > operating board:
50 >
51 > - Actually have trustee elections. E.g. have more nominated and
52 > accepting
53 > board candidates than open seats.
54 > - Actually buy D&O.
55 > - Actually hire a finance person.
56 > - File taxes on time for 3 consecutive years.
57 > - Actually retain a legal advisor.
58 > - Actually engage in long-term planning activities (including
59 > fundraising,
60 > if D&O is too expensive.)
61 >
62 >
63 > >
64 > > I don't percieve a vote for Alec, at this time, as a vote to wind up
65 > > the Foundaion, that happens later with a vote of members.
66 > >
67 >
68 > > Its a vote to fix things, possibly by throwing money at the
69 > problems.
70 > >
71 >
72 > Certainly Matthew and I share the same step 1. I don't think we share
73 > anything after that in terms of future vision.
74 >
75 > Note that as a trustee I have voting power and I doubt I will use it
76 > to
77 > further expand the activities of the foundation; I want to do the
78 > *opposite*.
79 >
80 > So sure, you can say "I don't perceive a vote for Alec as vote for
81 > winding
82 > up" but I'm explicitly stating I will vote with that set of goals in
83 > mind.
84 >
85 > -A
86 >
87 >
88 > > I support the approach if not the ultimate goal.
89 > >
90 > > --
91 > > Regards,
92 > >
93 > > Roy Bamford
94 > > (Neddyseagoon) a member of
95 > > elections
96 > > gentoo-ops
97 > > forum-mods
98 > >
99 >
100
101 Agreed that fixing things and fixing things them keeping them fixed is
102 two different but sucessive steps.
103
104 How long do you expect the combined step 1 to take?
105
106 I understand that time is money ... if you pay more it can happen faster.
107
108 --
109 Regards,
110
111 Roy Bamford
112 (Neddyseagoon) a member of
113 elections
114 gentoo-ops
115 forum-mods