1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 2008.01.31 19:01, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:24 -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
7 |
> > OK, I'm starting a new thread here to try to discuss some things |
8 |
> > the trustees can do to improve both visibility and also attempt to |
9 |
> > ensure/promote progress within the Foundation. Please chime in |
10 |
> > with your own ideas. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > - Regular meetings - The trustees should have a regular monthly |
13 |
> > meeting to discuss progress, preferably the first week of the month |
14 |
> > (for GMN). |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > - Regular GMN section - I think that both the Council and the |
17 |
> > trustees should have a section each for summaries of their latest |
18 |
> > meetings. This should relay information about what is happening to |
19 |
> > the developer pool and the community, in general. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > - Named positions - I also think that specifically putting certain |
22 |
> > people into certain positions would possibly improve getting things |
23 |
> > done. For each position, there should be an alternate, so that we |
24 |
> > don't |
25 |
> > end up relying on a single person. This also breaks up the |
26 |
> > responsibilities a bit so that the trustees and the community know |
27 |
> > what responsibilities that each person should be working. |
28 |
> > Positions that I see that could/should be filled: President, |
29 |
> > Secretary, Treasurer |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > Those are my initial ideas. Comments? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> +1 to all |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Also I think that possibly the trustees should do more personnel and |
36 |
> drama management. Which presently falls under the council, but |
37 |
> doesn't |
38 |
> seem technical in nature. But that could potentially be |
39 |
> controversial, |
40 |
> and not likely to be one of the first actions. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> One of the first actions I would like to see. Which I will mention |
43 |
> when |
44 |
> I write a formal agenda for my plans in office if elected. Is to |
45 |
> transfer financial and legal matters to the SPI, pending a vote on |
46 |
> the |
47 |
> matter. Verses doing it in house. |
48 |
> |
49 |
> If that happened, we would still need named positions. As in one |
50 |
> person, |
51 |
> with a backup to be the liaison between Gentoo and the SPI. Along |
52 |
> with |
53 |
> other defined/named roles for a re-focused board of trustees. With |
54 |
> the |
55 |
> main weight of financial and legal obligations and responsibilities |
56 |
> removed. |
57 |
> |
58 |
> Focusing then on fund raising, relations, bolstering the community, |
59 |
> etc. |
60 |
> All of the things that don't fall under the realm of the council. |
61 |
> Which |
62 |
> as stated above, some things might need transfer of responsibility |
63 |
> from |
64 |
> council to foundation. For non technical things, and things the |
65 |
> council |
66 |
> would rather not deal with nor should have to. |
67 |
> |
68 |
> |
69 |
> -- |
70 |
> William L. Thomson Jr. |
71 |
> Gentoo/amd64/Java |
72 |
> |
73 |
|
74 |
+1 to all of that. |
75 |
|
76 |
I'm in the process of writing my election manefesto and learning Guide |
77 |
XML (or whatever its real name is) and I have included most of the |
78 |
above before I read the posts :( |
79 |
|
80 |
All I can say is me too! |
81 |
|
82 |
Oh I guess that means I accept my nomination. |
83 |
|
84 |
- -- |
85 |
Regards, |
86 |
|
87 |
Roy Bamford |
88 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
89 |
gentoo-ops |
90 |
forum-mods |
91 |
treecleaners |
92 |
|
93 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
94 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
95 |
|
96 |
iD8DBQFHojMyTE4/y7nJvasRAtKoAKDnwqxPiqhGr9uA3U+wkKMZlbjEQQCg99xC |
97 |
pGulbXWDIGVCNGytIPk48Dg= |
98 |
=QtXO |
99 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
100 |
|
101 |
-- |
102 |
gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list |