| 1 |
unsubscribe |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
2018-04-15 16:28 GMT+02:00 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto < |
| 4 |
jmbsvicetto@g.o>: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> On 15-04-2018 01:42, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 7 |
> > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:46 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |
| 8 |
> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> >>> The people behind the ban appear to be the usual suspects running |
| 11 |
> >>> ComRel/Council. |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> Yet another friendly warning: this kind of unsubstantiated got you |
| 14 |
> >> already time off the mailing list. |
| 15 |
> >> |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Can you please explain what I did wrong and point to the CoC to support |
| 18 |
> > your position? "Usual suspects" in this case is mgorny, ulm, dilfridge. |
| 19 |
> > Mgorny and ulm are on council, dilfridge runs ComRel. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Daniel, |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> please stop using language as "usual suspects" to question the integrity |
| 24 |
> or character of the people you are disagreeing with. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> In this particular case, you're also "targetting" developers that are |
| 27 |
> not responsible for the decisions you're attacking. The Council had |
| 28 |
> nothing to do with wltjr's ban from the ml. |
| 29 |
> AFAIK, Ulrich never had any public interactions with William in the mls, |
| 30 |
> so I don't see how he can be accused of having any responsibility on |
| 31 |
> William's ban from the mailing list. |
| 32 |
> Finally, Andreas is the ComRel lead, but he doesn't run ComRel. As a |
| 33 |
> member of ComRel, I strongly object to that idea and can assure the |
| 34 |
> community that ComRel acts as a team where the members express opinions |
| 35 |
> and discuss matters trying to find consensus - we rarely all agree on a |
| 36 |
> subject, but we find a common ground that allows us to reach decisions. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> On 15-04-2018 02:52, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 41 |
> > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> |
| 42 |
> wrote: |
| 43 |
> >> |
| 44 |
> >> |
| 45 |
> >> In the mean time, Luca, is ComRel planning to take an actions on |
| 46 |
> mgorny's |
| 47 |
> >> suggestion that William be shot? Even if tongue in cheek,r ac I am |
| 48 |
> sure you |
| 49 |
> >> realize it's inappropriate. |
| 50 |
> >> |
| 51 |
> > |
| 52 |
> > What's the matter, Luca? Cat caught your tongue? |
| 53 |
> > |
| 54 |
> > Since I was banned from a Gentoo mailing list for 7 days for using a |
| 55 |
> > naughty word, I am curious what will happen to mgorny for wishing out |
| 56 |
> loud |
| 57 |
> > that someone experience a violent death. |
| 58 |
> > |
| 59 |
> > I know what would happen if I didn't bring attention to it: nothing. |
| 60 |
> > What is still likely to happen after I bring attention to it: nothing. |
| 61 |
> |
| 62 |
> Just because you don't see any discussions about the issue you refer, |
| 63 |
> that doesn't mean ComRel isn't looking into it. Most of ComRel work is |
| 64 |
> done out of the "spotlights". When we're able to do our job in a very |
| 65 |
> effective way, people don't even notice our actions. |
| 66 |
> For this particular case, ComRel is already working on it and there is |
| 67 |
> an official complaint by William on bug 653192[1]. |
| 68 |
> |
| 69 |
> [1] - https://bugs.gentoo.org/653192 |
| 70 |
> |
| 71 |
> In any case, the discussion about this issue was started independently |
| 72 |
> of William's bug or your post to this ml. |
| 73 |
> |
| 74 |
> For the Gentoo ComRel team, |
| 75 |
> |
| 76 |
> Best regards, |
| 77 |
> Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
| 78 |
> |
| 79 |
> |
Archives