| 1 |
On 09/04/2018 19:24, Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 2 |
> Gentoo has been known to be a two headed entity for a while. While the |
| 3 |
> fact is that only one of the heads has legal standing to be called |
| 4 |
> Gentoo, the other head has been doing most of the technical work. |
| 5 |
> Unfortunately having two heads means that there can be fighting between |
| 6 |
> them. In order to finally put the matter to some rest I seek to define |
| 7 |
> Gentoo's org structure. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The structure is quite simple: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
- a money-managing entity with the task of collecting donations and |
| 13 |
paying for activities |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
- an informal organization, with an elective council acting as steering |
| 16 |
committee, doing stuff that makes people willing to donate money so the |
| 17 |
informal organization keeps delivering nice stuff. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The Debian people aren't members by default of Assoli or SPI(or any of |
| 20 |
the many money collectors on-behalf-of they have. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
It is the nth times that you keep suggesting something that ultimately |
| 23 |
gets (mis)interpreted as a way for the foundation to meddle with the |
| 24 |
Gentoo organizational processes. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
lu |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
PS: Comrel is independent from the council beside in case of appeal, |
| 30 |
please stop repeating something that is not correct. |
Archives