1 |
On 18-07-12 14:26:46, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:15 PM Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > Fixing things to wind up the Foundation and fixing things to run |
5 |
> > the Foundation is exactly the same work. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > I don't percieve a vote for Alec, at this time, as a vote to wind up |
8 |
> > the Foundaion, that happens later with a vote of members. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Its a vote to fix things, possibly by throwing money at the problems. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Sort of. Keep in mind that if your strategy is to achieve compliance |
14 |
> and spin down, then you're going to be willing to spend quite a bit of |
15 |
> money to resolve things (an unsustainable amount long-term, but there |
16 |
> is no long-term). You're also going to try to avoid doing stuff that |
17 |
> makes that more complicated (ongoing operations/etc). You don't need |
18 |
> a sustainable process, because there is nothing to sustain. Instead |
19 |
> the focus should be on what comes next. If you can get that long-term |
20 |
> body to start picking up bills and building up donations before you |
21 |
> shut down that might also make sense. You might appoint a lawyer as |
22 |
> your treasurer/etc. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Then if the community doesn't back the vote you just go bankrupt |
25 |
> because you're out of money and have no sustainable model going |
26 |
> forward. Either way you dissolve the org I guess, it just changes |
27 |
> whether the community vs the IRS gets the Gentoo name. |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
One reason to do the vote early vs late |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |