1 |
On 18-06-03 21:03:47, Raymond Jennings wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
3 |
> <jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> >> |
6 |
> >> Hello, everyone. |
7 |
> >> |
8 |
> >> This one has came up a few times recently, and I think it would be |
9 |
> >> reasonable to finally put it as formal motion. I'd like to propose |
10 |
> >> removing from Bylaws section 5.2 (Qualification) [1] the following |
11 |
> >> paragraph: |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> >> No individual shall serve as a Gentoo Foundation Trustee and Gentoo |
14 |
> >> Council Member concurrently |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > <snip> |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> >> -- |
20 |
> >> Best regards, |
21 |
> >> Michał Górny |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > I never agreed with this restriction and always felt it should be left for |
26 |
> > the electorate to decide, so +1 from me on this proposal. |
27 |
> > Regards, |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > Jorge |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> |
32 |
> For my part I would like to raise a point of potential conflicts of |
33 |
> interest if one person were to serve both roles. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Though I'd be happy to let each electorate decide as well. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> To address the potential conflict of interest case, one might need to |
38 |
> have clearly defined what they're supposed to do in the first place. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Less rehashign what is already known and perhaps more formal |
41 |
> documentation of it. There is some apparent disagreement. |
42 |
> |
43 |
|
44 |
Can you give an example of such a conflict? I think the only thing I |
45 |
can think of is once we get travel reimbursement done is self granting |
46 |
it. If such a thing happens (self granting) without VERY good reason |
47 |
I'd likely organize a removal / vote of no confidence. |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |