| 1 |
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
| 2 |
<jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Hello, everyone. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> This one has came up a few times recently, and I think it would be |
| 8 |
>> reasonable to finally put it as formal motion. I'd like to propose |
| 9 |
>> removing from Bylaws section 5.2 (Qualification) [1] the following |
| 10 |
>> paragraph: |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> No individual shall serve as a Gentoo Foundation Trustee and Gentoo |
| 13 |
>> Council Member concurrently |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> <snip> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>> -- |
| 19 |
>> Best regards, |
| 20 |
>> Michał Górny |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I never agreed with this restriction and always felt it should be left for |
| 25 |
> the electorate to decide, so +1 from me on this proposal. |
| 26 |
> Regards, |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Jorge |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
For my part I would like to raise a point of potential conflicts of |
| 32 |
interest if one person were to serve both roles. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Though I'd be happy to let each electorate decide as well. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
To address the potential conflict of interest case, one might need to |
| 37 |
have clearly defined what they're supposed to do in the first place. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Less rehashign what is already known and perhaps more formal |
| 40 |
documentation of it. There is some apparent disagreement. |
Archives