Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Next meeting; a motion to have 1 type of Gentoo member.
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 10:44:47
Message-Id: Nevbb2QDLJApjOZDFnTNCG@fPUC13lbnv9TLqZoE+0Zk
In Reply to: [gentoo-nfp] Next meeting; a motion to have 1 type of Gentoo member. by Alec Warner
1 On 2016.11.07 02:32, Alec Warner wrote:
2 > The foundation currently has 1 member type (in the bylaws) but Gentoo
3 > itself still seems to have 2 (Gentoo staff and Ebuild developer)
4 >
5 > This motion represents an idea that the community itself would only
6 > have 1
7 > contributor type.
8 >
9 > 1) Contributors must take the staff quiz (which we should rename to
10 > the
11 > contributor quiz.)
12 >
13 > 2) Contributors are encouraged to be foundation members, but
14 > membership is
15 > not required. We may amend the contributor onboarding process to offer
16 > foundation membership at the time they join Gentoo as a contributor.
17 >
18 > 3) Contributors that want access to the gentoo ebuild repository still
19 > need
20 > to follow the normal recruiting process (ebuild quiz, mentor, 30 day
21 > period.)
22 >
23 > 4) Contributors that do not want access to the gentoo ebuild
24 > repository
25 > (because they contribute in other ways) do not need to take the ebuild
26 > quiz. Its unclear if a 30 day grace period is required for non-ebuild
27 > groups.
28 >
29 > 5) Existing developers and staff are rebranded as contributors.
30 >
31 > If approved, I expect a few months of working with comrel to adjust
32 > existing policy documents and recruiting guidelines to implement.
33 >
34 > -A
35 >
36
37 Its worth explaining a bit of the background.
38 Historically, both ebuild devs and staff had quizzes to onboard with
39 the project. Foundation membership for this group was opt in
40 from 2008. Prior to 2008 it was opt out.
41
42 From 2008, non project members were able to gain Foundation
43 membership by demonstrating support of Gentoo.
44
45 This has lead to potentially two different constituencies of electors
46 as foundation members are not a subset of Gentoo project
47 members. It is theoretically possible for a board to be elected
48 that does not reflect the wishes of the Gentoo project electorate.
49
50 From memory, the foundation has had at most three members
51 who have not done any quizzes. These individuals can vote
52 for and serve on the foundation board but not council.
53
54 This motion, if carried, would be a first step to move Gentoo
55 back to a single constituency of electors, as it was prior to 2008.
56
57 --
58 Regards,
59
60 Roy Bamford
61 (Neddyseagoon) a member of
62 elections
63 gentoo-ops
64 forum-mods
65 trustees