Gentoo Archives: gentoo-perl

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-perl@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] g-cpan-0.14.0_rc2 feedback?
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:11:07
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-perl] g-cpan-0.14.0_rc2 feedback? by Antoine Raillon
Hash: SHA1

Antoine Raillon wrote:
> Michael Cummings a écrit : >> I'm figuring if anyone is using this, its the folks on this list. rc2 >> fixes a few minor bugs in rc1, and I haven't seen any reports of trouble >> with it ('course, I need to actually look for reports too :), so I was >> wondering if anyone on here had had any problems (or not). There are >> some significant changes between 0.13* and 0.14*, so test the hell out >> of it if you can :) >> > Sorry, not a lot of time to check this out (currently waiting the end of > an emerge -e world, 670 packages..) but i'll asap ;) > > btw I'm not sure the Gentoo:: naming for packages is the best thing to > do. Since these packages are tools for g-cpan, I would use something > like Gentoo::gcpan::package, just in case in some future days someone > creates packages using perl specifically for Gentoo but not g-cpan ;) > > Will add more comments later ;) > > ++, > cab >
rational on the gentoo:: namespace was that most of the modules are *not* g-cpan specific - one to deal with the portage tree, one to deal with cpan, one to deal with ebuild functions -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - iD8DBQFEjuNpq1ztTp5/Ti4RAlRXAJsHI1aTcSPghp0en0bhn7HPtjjFHQCcCUsz QFhspnJ/mQeEesyTz7OuIp8= =zWyl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list