Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] IUSE_EFFECTIVE and IUSE_REFERENCEABLE | ||
| Date: | Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:05:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 21409.61702.451455.974005@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] IUSE_EFFECTIVE and IUSE_REFERENCEABLE by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > It does: the rule then would be "if you want to use (+) and (-) on a |
| 4 | > USE_EXPAND flag, then you may only depend upon packages whose EAPI |
| 5 | > also supports (+) and (-)". |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Maybe we should add an explicit warning then? Something like this: |
| 8 | |
| 9 | "Behaviour is undefined if a 4-style default is applied to an ebuild |
| 10 | that has the flag in IUSE_EFFECTIVE but not in IUSE_REFERENCEABLE." |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-pms] IUSE_EFFECTIVE and IUSE_REFERENCEABLE | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |