Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] IUSE_EFFECTIVE and IUSE_REFERENCEABLE
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:22:12
Message-Id: 20140618212205.0c79fbf8@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] IUSE_EFFECTIVE and IUSE_REFERENCEABLE by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:05:26 +0200
2 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
3 > >>>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 > > It does: the rule then would be "if you want to use (+) and (-) on a
5 > > USE_EXPAND flag, then you may only depend upon packages whose EAPI
6 > > also supports (+) and (-)".
7 >
8 > Maybe we should add an explicit warning then? Something like this:
9 >
10 > "Behaviour is undefined if a 4-style default is applied to an ebuild
11 > that has the flag in IUSE_EFFECTIVE but not in IUSE_REFERENCEABLE."
12
13 Would be better to get repoman to check for it and forbid it.
14
15 --
16 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature