Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Question about PDEPEND | ||
| Date: | Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:30:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4B1EA980.4080800@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Question about PDEPEND by Pacho Ramos |
||
| 1 | Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 | > but he told me that PDEPEND is really the same as RDEPEND with cycle |
| 3 | > breaking. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | This is good description. It's handled the same as RDEPEND except |
| 6 | when it can't due to circular dependencies. That means that it's |
| 7 | installed before, just like RDEPEND, except when resolution of |
| 8 | circular dependencies requires it to be installed after. |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Thanks, |
| 11 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Question about PDEPEND | Pacho Ramos <pacho@××××××××××××××××××××××××.es> |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Question about PDEPEND | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |