Archives
Archives
| From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@××××××××××××××××××××××××.es> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Question about PDEPEND | ||
| Date: | Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:06:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1260302734.9396.0.camel@localhost.localdomain | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Question about PDEPEND by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | El mar, 08-12-2009 a las 11:31 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: |
| 2 | > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 | > > but he told me that PDEPEND is really the same as RDEPEND with cycle |
| 4 | > > breaking. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > This is good description. It's handled the same as RDEPEND except |
| 7 | > when it can't due to circular dependencies. That means that it's |
| 8 | > installed before, just like RDEPEND, except when resolution of |
| 9 | > circular dependencies requires it to be installed after. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Fine, thanks a lot =) |