| 1 |
On 31 March 2016 at 01:49, Joakim Tjernlund |
| 2 |
<Joakim.Tjernlund@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I am missing something? |
| 5 |
> Generally I think that everything possible to do under /etc/portage should be |
| 6 |
> doable under a profile as well. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
So after you ignore my other stuff: Profiles are part of the PMS |
| 10 |
specification, so any changes that go in there have to be EAPI |
| 11 |
scheduled and cried over for a bit, and probably GLEPs and stuff also. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I guess portage could informally support it prior to any such |
| 14 |
specification materialising, but it would have to be forbidden in the |
| 15 |
main tree until such a specification was defined, or the portage tree |
| 16 |
would become PMS in-compatible. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Kent |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |
Archives