1 |
On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 10:49 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> On 05/09/2015 10:08 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 09:36 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
4 |
> > > On 05/09/2015 06:47 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
5 |
> > > > On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 11:32 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
6 |
> > > > > On 05/07/2015 11:43 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
7 |
> > > > > > On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 14:09 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
8 |
> > > > > > > On 05/07/2015 03:51 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
9 |
> > > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 22:45 +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
10 |
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 15:16 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
11 |
> > > > > > > > > > On 05/06/15 14:57, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
12 |
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 14:36 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
13 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 05/06/15 14:30, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
14 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 13:30 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
15 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 05/06/15 13:22, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
16 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 12:54 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
17 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The idea is that you have separate repositories configured for each |
18 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ROOT. If it's satisfying a build-time DEPEND that will be installed into |
19 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ROOT=/, then it's supposed to use the repositories configured for ROOT=/. |
20 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > |
21 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I see, but in my case I only install into my sysroot so I don't want this behaviour. |
22 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > |
23 |
> > > > > > > > > > > > So, why don't you use the --root-deps option? |
24 |
> > > > > > > > > > > |
25 |
> > > > > > > > > > > Just did(and --root-deps=rdeps too) and it didn't work, still wants to use |
26 |
> > > > > > > > > > > my newer hosts pkgs. :( |
27 |
> > > > > > > > > > |
28 |
> > > > > > > > > > It shouldn't do that. It sounds like maybe the [gentoo] config |
29 |
> > > > > > > > > > from/usr/share/portage/config/repos.conf is the source of your problems, |
30 |
> > > > > > > > > > since you $PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT config will always inherit that. Would |
31 |
> > > > > > > > > > that be consistent with your observations? |
32 |
> > > > > > > > > |
33 |
> > > > > > > > > Moving that file out of the way changed things, now I got I profile error: |
34 |
> > > > > > > > > !!! Unable to parse profile: '/etc/portage/make.profile' |
35 |
> > > > > > > > > !!! ParseError: Parent 'gentoo:default/linux/amd64/13.0' not found: |
36 |
> > > > > > > > > '/var/lib/layman/transmode/profiles/gentoo64-server/parent' |
37 |
> > > > > > > > > !!! Your current profile is invalid. If you have just changed your profile |
38 |
> > > > > > > > > !!! configuration, you should revert back to the previous configuration. |
39 |
> > > > > > > > > !!! Allowed actions are limited to --help, --info, --search, --sync, and |
40 |
> > > > > > > > > !!! --version. |
41 |
> > > > > > > > > |
42 |
> > > > > > > > > Which I think is a problem in my cross env. |
43 |
> > > > > > > > |
44 |
> > > > > > > > No, this is not it. Portage just bails when reading the host profile which it should not. |
45 |
> > > > > > > > |
46 |
> > > > > > > > Note: defining |
47 |
> > > > > > > > PORTAGE_REPOSITORIES=/my/own/repos.conf |
48 |
> > > > > > > > gives the same error. |
49 |
> > > > > > > > |
50 |
> > > > > > > |
51 |
> > > > > > > According to the error message, your transmode profile inherits a gentoo |
52 |
> > > > > > > profile, so you need the gentoo repository (at least the relevant profile). |
53 |
> > > > > > |
54 |
> > > > > > I have a my own profile in PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT which does not |
55 |
> > > > > > reference the host /etc/portage/make.profile at all so I think |
56 |
> > > > > > portage is using the wrong profile. |
57 |
> > > > > |
58 |
> > > > > When using ROOT=/foo, it always instantiates 2 profiles, and it uses one |
59 |
> > > > > profile for ROOT=/foo and the other profile for ROOT=/. |
60 |
> > > > |
61 |
> > > > This makes sense when just using ROOT, not when cross compiling. |
62 |
> > > > If I cross build (or use PORTAGE_REPOSITORIES ?) I don't think it makes |
63 |
> > > > sense to add the hosts profile as it has little to nothing to |
64 |
> > > > do with my cross target. |
65 |
> > > > How would a cross target use the hosts profile sensibly? |
66 |
> > > |
67 |
> > > The host profile is only used for packages installed to ROOT=/ in order |
68 |
> > > to satisfy DEPEND. If you use the emerge --root-deps then the host |
69 |
> > > profile is used for absolutely nothing (although it is still instantiated). |
70 |
> > |
71 |
> > I see, it would be nice if it wasn't instantiated when not needed so |
72 |
> > one could avoid the error I have seen. |
73 |
> > |
74 |
> > > |
75 |
> > > > > |
76 |
> > > > > > Futhermore, it does not understand the host profile, probably |
77 |
> > > > > > because my own PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT don't have profile-formats = portage-2 |
78 |
> > > > > |
79 |
> > > > > You're saying this beciase of the above ParseError? I think maybe what |
80 |
> > > > > you want to do keep the default /usr/share/portage/config/repos.conf and |
81 |
> > > > > mask */*::gentoo in $PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT/etc/portage/package.mask. |
82 |
> > > > |
83 |
> > > > That is what I am doing now, but that still includes the hosts profile I think ? |
84 |
> > > |
85 |
> > > It will only be used for packages installed to ROOT=/ in order to |
86 |
> > > satisfy DEPEND, as I have mentioned above. |
87 |
> > |
88 |
> > OK, you always read the host profile in case you need it. |
89 |
> > May I suggest you avoid touching the host profile when it not used(cross complies)? |
90 |
> |
91 |
> I suppose we could lazily instantiate the config for ROOT=/ at the point |
92 |
> where a a DEPEND needs to be satisfied (or HDEPEND for EAPI 5-hdepend). |
93 |
> See this bug: |
94 |
> |
95 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324179 |
96 |
|
97 |
Right, seen that bug before :) |
98 |
|
99 |
However, there may be a another bug in here. Portage is complaining over not being able |
100 |
to load the hosts profile as the hosts is using "profile-formats = portage-2" and my |
101 |
CONFIGROOT is not. I don't think my CONFIGROOT should be forced to use "profile-formats = portage-2" |
102 |
just because the host is? |
103 |
|
104 |
Jocke |