Archives
Archives
| From: | Adrian Gschwend <ktk@×××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: Re: portage-ng roadmap? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:23:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | xgxargynofbet.i04o4u2.pminews@news.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: portage-ng roadmap? by John Nilsson |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:07:49 +0200, John Nilsson wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >What are the problem you want to solve? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | >What features of gentoo seems to be a good solution? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I didn't run into any problems yet, I've basically read the portage-ng page |
| 8 | at gentoo.org and it made the impression, that at the moment portage just |
| 9 | works painless on Linux. But after what I saw now I simply will give it a try |
| 10 | I think |
| 11 | |
| 12 | cu |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Adrian |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |