From: | John Nilsson <john@×××××××.nu> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Adrian Gschwend <ktk@×××××××.org> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: portage-ng roadmap? | ||
Date: | Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:04:52 | ||
Message-Id: | 1088586469.28410.1.camel@newkid.milsson.nu | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: portage-ng roadmap? by Adrian Gschwend |
1 | What are the problem you want to solve? |
2 | |
3 | What features of gentoo seems to be a good solution? |
4 | |
5 | -John |
6 | |
7 | On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 11:03, Adrian Gschwend wrote: |
8 | > ok after all I care less about a portage-ng but about something I can use on |
9 | > non-Linux platforms :-) Is pvdabeel also reading this list? |
10 | > |
11 | > cu |
12 | > |
13 | > Adrian |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: Re: portage-ng roadmap? | Adrian Gschwend <ktk@×××××××.org> |