1 |
On Sunday 28 November 2004 1:28 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:24:44 -0800 (PST) Sorav Bansal |
3 |
> |
4 |
> <sbansal@××××××××.edu> wrote: |
5 |
> | Hence, any project that calls install -s will be troublesome for me. |
6 |
> | Anyways, I really appreciate your help. In case you have any |
7 |
> | suggestions on how to get around the install -s problem, that would be |
8 |
> | great! |
9 |
> |
10 |
> As I recall from when we first started messing around with cross |
11 |
> compiling (we couldn't get strip to work...) the easiest way is to make |
12 |
> strip a symlink to /bin/true... |
13 |
|
14 |
OTOH, it shall be possible to provide a new eclass function (maybe executed by |
15 |
default) that modifies each existing Makefile that strips out all -s right |
16 |
behind "install" commands. Just like done with strip-flags for C[XX]FLAGS. |
17 |
|
18 |
That impossible? |
19 |
Christian Parpart. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
http://www.winterschur.de/?fey <-- sheep me! |
23 |
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt |
24 |
12:46:25 up 30 days, 5:16, 2 users, load average: 1.10, 0.69, 0.58 |