Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:21:50
Message-Id: 553632C5.2070508@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On 04/21/2015 05:48 AM, Duncan wrote:
2 >>
3 >> Well, I don't use INSTALL_MASK myself, so I don't have a real-world
4 >> use-case for you. However, it's clear that the code will expand shell
5 >> globs, so I preserved that behavior for compatibility.
6 >
7 > I do, with shell globs, tho I didn't bother checking the above to see if
8 > they'd have been affected.
9 >
10
11 The docs for INSTALL_MASK (man 5 make.conf) don't mention that globs
12 will work. It's expecting a "space delimited list of file names." Does
13 it really take a space-delimited list of globs instead? If so, how does
14 that reconcile with the fact that * could match spaces?

Replies