| 1 |
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 22:40, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I've just been going through some of the unresolved bugs and have found |
| 5 |
> (especially in the earlier bug #s) that there are many feature requests |
| 6 |
> that are unresolved. I'm thinking it would be a good idea to create a |
| 7 |
> "master" bug for portage-ng and then make it depend on all of these |
| 8 |
> unresolved feature requests. Pros? It would make it easy to confirm that |
| 9 |
> there's nothing missing from the reqspec and also make it easy to close |
| 10 |
> many (hundreds?) of bugs on portage-ng's completion. Cons? Massive amount |
| 11 |
> of deps from a single bug. Thoughts? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Woops! I didn't believe this address was registered and thought it would |
| 14 |
bounce. In fact, I'm sure it's not registered as I don't get list e-mail |
| 15 |
twice. Perhaps because it was sent via my registered e-mail address's mail |
| 16 |
server? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives