Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:08:59
Message-Id: 1144670930.16677.1.camel@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? by Zac Medico
1 On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 02:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > Hi everyone,
6 >
7 > What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
8 > I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any trouble with them.
9 > Are there any arguments against making them default?
10
11 This is would qualify as core change. Please post this on the -dev ml.
12
13
14
15 > Zac
16 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
18 >
19 > iD8DBQFEOiRf/ejvha5XGaMRAn+kAJ9ieh37OjEwTriDQt/xPnmMGqEPsQCg7qvf
20 > XEcYhyzdGSDBj8HtH8QYJzk=
21 > =ge1C
22 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
23
24
25 --
26 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
27 Gentoo Linux
28
29 --
30 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies