| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
> Zac Medico wrote: |
| 6 |
>> implement greedy atoms for the world set. I've been pondering the |
| 7 |
>> idea of making world non-greedy for slots by default [1], since you |
| 8 |
>> can add slot atoms to the world file to pull in any specific slot(s) |
| 9 |
>> that you want. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> That would rock. Portage always insisting on pulling in the highest |
| 12 |
> SLOT whether needed or not is one of my biggest pet-peeves. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Well, you can already use SLOT atoms in your world file if you don't |
| 15 |
want the highest available. Packages that pull in >=foo are a |
| 16 |
different story though. I suppose we can add something like a |
| 17 |
- --upgrade=minimal option that prevents pulling in new slots if they |
| 18 |
aren't required. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Zac |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iD8DBQFHHXiN/ejvha5XGaMRApBQAKDg5r8+l+bcLBEA+JRttstymUoYFgCg8j6M |
| 25 |
m5j8mSrC0hfQP+TRGqnrC+0= |
| 26 |
=hWGS |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives