| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ferris McCormick schrieb: |
| 5 |
>> It looks different, if spam is installed and I try to install bacon |
| 6 |
>> additionally: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> # emerge -1av bacon |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> Calculating dependencies ... done! |
| 13 |
>> [ebuild UD] app-test/eggs-1 [2] 0 kB [1] |
| 14 |
>> [ebuild N ] app-test/bacon-1 0 kB [1] |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> What happens if you use |
| 18 |
> emerge -1avD bacon |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Does not work either. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
>> This second behavior looks wrong to me, as it downgrades the RDEPEND of |
| 24 |
>> spam and thus spam becomes unusable. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Yeah, it does look wrong, but I don't think it is. Ideally, I suppose |
| 28 |
> eggs-1 could depend on !=app-test/spam-1 and so on, but that requires |
| 29 |
> coordination among developers. I suppose there is a bug in the ebuilds |
| 30 |
> because they should be set up so that if you have spam installed, you |
| 31 |
> can't install bacon and so on. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I think, this would be the wrong way., as they block each other already |
| 34 |
because of the RDEPEND. Else one would have to check the whole tree for |
| 35 |
a conflicting RDEPEND and then adding a whole bunch of blocks. |
| 36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
| 38 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkofqzsACgkQ4UOg/zhYFuD4XQCeKUuemmNjWr7shtgsttc93sro |
| 41 |
1U0An0SrsWexvLUmYtvzyjokpZiQyqSm |
| 42 |
=vvTO |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives