| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Fri, 29 May 2009 01:36:20 +0200
|
| 5 |
René 'Necoro' Neumann <lists@××××××.eu> wrote:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 8 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Hi, |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> (The following is done with portage-2.2_rc33) |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I created some small test-packages for the following usecase: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Package "spam" rdepends on "=eggs-2". |
| 17 |
> Package "bacon" rdepends on "=eggs-1". |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> So in theory there should be no way of installing them together (given |
| 20 |
> that eggs is not slotted). This works if I try to install them in one go. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled |
| 23 |
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> app-test/eggs:0 |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> ('ebuild', '/', 'app-test/eggs-2', 'merge') pulled in by |
| 28 |
> =app-test/eggs-2 required by ('ebuild', '/', 'app-test/spam-1', 'merge') |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> ('ebuild', '/', 'app-test/eggs-1', 'merge') pulled in by |
| 31 |
> =app-test/eggs-1 required by ('ebuild', '/', 'app-test/bacon-1', |
| 32 |
> 'merge') |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> It looks different, if spam is installed and I try to install bacon |
| 36 |
> additionally: |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> # emerge -1av bacon |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> Calculating dependencies ... done! |
| 43 |
> [ebuild UD] app-test/eggs-1 [2] 0 kB [1] |
| 44 |
> [ebuild N ] app-test/bacon-1 0 kB [1] |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
What happens if you use
|
| 48 |
emerge -1avD bacon
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
> This second behavior looks wrong to me, as it downgrades the RDEPEND of |
| 51 |
> spam and thus spam becomes unusable. |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
Yeah, it does look wrong, but I don't think it is. Ideally, I suppose
|
| 55 |
eggs-1 could depend on !=app-test/spam-1 and so on, but that requires
|
| 56 |
coordination among developers. I suppose there is a bug in the ebuilds
|
| 57 |
because they should be set up so that if you have spam installed, you
|
| 58 |
can't install bacon and so on.
|
| 59 |
> Regards, |
| 60 |
> René |
| 61 |
> |
| 62 |
> P.S.: In case it matters: You can find the repository containing the |
| 63 |
> trivial ebuilds here: https://code.launchpad.net/~necoro/+junk/test_repo |
| 64 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 65 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
| 66 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 67 |
> |
| 68 |
> iEYEARECAAYFAkofH/QACgkQ4UOg/zhYFuDK/ACfegI2ylDDQV1/VZu+XAXUMUpL |
| 69 |
> 9icAnRSvVxoK/XuZhOO3jWlXmXUjWV7p |
| 70 |
> =1RJK |
| 71 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 72 |
> |
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
Regards,
|
| 75 |
Ferris
|
| 76 |
- --
|
| 77 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
|
| 78 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
|
| 79 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 80 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkofKE4ACgkQQa6M3+I///ecCQCfc17hm2Ih9hUbbVxVhIBzjrjK
|
| 83 |
xNMAnjkFUhSAfE7J9EXdCvpbjMq2afKk
|
| 84 |
=0M+O
|
| 85 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives