Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:06:36
Message-Id: 43FCD20A.3050709@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5 by Paul Varner
1 Paul Varner wrote:
2 > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
3 >
4 >>Your testing is appreciated.
5 >
6 >
7 > I'll file a bug for this one, once I investigate further. 'genlop -t'
8 > doesn't get along with it very well.
9 >
10 > # genlop -t screen
11 > * app-misc/screen
12 > <snip>
13 >
14 > Thu Dec 15 23:10:28 2005 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
15 > merge time: 1 minute and 11 seconds.
16 >
17 > Wed Feb 22 13:11:30 2006 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
18 > merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 2 minutes and 13 seconds.
19 >
20 > Wed Feb 22 13:16:04 2006 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
21 > merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 6 minutes and 47 seconds.
22 >
23 > Wed Feb 22 13:16:47 2006 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
24 > merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 7 minutes and 30 seconds.
25 >
26 > The last three emerges were done with 2.1_pre5 where I was testing the
27 > effects of enabling confcache
28 >
29
30 I did make some minor grammar changes to the log output that could cause
31 odd times. Other than that, no clue on this one.
32
33 > Regards,
34 > Paul
35 --
36 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list