Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Paul Varner <fuzzyray@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:27:00
Message-Id: 1140636378.31814.8.camel@txslpc1d36.wkst.vzwnet.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5 by Alec Warner
1 On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
2 > Your testing is appreciated.
3
4 I'll file a bug for this one, once I investigate further. 'genlop -t'
5 doesn't get along with it very well.
6
7 # genlop -t screen
8 * app-misc/screen
9 <snip>
10
11 Thu Dec 15 23:10:28 2005 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
12 merge time: 1 minute and 11 seconds.
13
14 Wed Feb 22 13:11:30 2006 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
15 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 2 minutes and 13 seconds.
16
17 Wed Feb 22 13:16:04 2006 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
18 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 6 minutes and 47 seconds.
19
20 Wed Feb 22 13:16:47 2006 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
21 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 7 minutes and 30 seconds.
22
23 The last three emerges were done with 2.1_pre5 where I was testing the
24 effects of enabling confcache
25
26 Regards,
27 Paul
28 --
29 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5 Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>