Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 02:36:08
Message-Id: 43FD1F6D.3080808@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5 by Paul Varner
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Paul Varner wrote:
5 > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
6 >> Your testing is appreciated.
7 >
8 > I'll file a bug for this one, once I investigate further. 'genlop -t'
9 > doesn't get along with it very well.
10 >
11 > # genlop -t screen
12 > * app-misc/screen
13 > <snip>
14 >
15 > Thu Dec 15 23:10:28 2005 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
16 > merge time: 1 minute and 11 seconds.
17 >
18 > Wed Feb 22 13:11:30 2006 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
19 > merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 2 minutes and 13 seconds.
20 >
21 > Wed Feb 22 13:16:04 2006 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
22 > merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 6 minutes and 47 seconds.
23 >
24 > Wed Feb 22 13:16:47 2006 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4
25 > merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 7 minutes and 30 seconds.
26 >
27 > The last three emerges were done with 2.1_pre5 where I was testing the
28 > effects of enabling confcache
29 >
30
31 After you've updated to the new ebuild (with patch), run `sed -i 's/>>> Emerging/>>> emerge/g' /var/log/emerge.log` and genlop should work correctly again.
32
33 Zac
34 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
36
37 iD8DBQFD/R9s/ejvha5XGaMRAk3RAJ9AEi+miC8eXju0u3ZOILIlPG9UaQCgrUTz
38 u9HxdCRuVkj6/RwlkTUJmak=
39 =r7kR
40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
41 --
42 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5 Paul Varner <fuzzyray@g.o>