| 1 |
On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 13:16 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 17:13 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > > 2. What happens to the LTS branch when the next EAPI is released? |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > I haven't really thought about it. Are you suggesting that we could |
| 8 |
> > bump 'master' Portage to newer EAPI earlier or...? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I just mean that, a priori, the LTS branch won't be able to install |
| 12 |
> ebuilds that use the next EAPI. Backporting an entire EAPI doesn't seem |
| 13 |
> appropriate for a stable series; but maintaining an increasingly- |
| 14 |
> obsolete branch at that point doesn't make much sense either. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Ah, that makes sense. Indeed, I suppose a new EAPI will be a good point |
| 17 |
of switching master to LTS. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Michał Górny |
Archives