| 1 |
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:34:44 -0500 |
| 2 |
Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> For packages that are in the "system" set, wouldn't adding the |
| 5 |
> contents of system.{,r}depend to {,R}DEPEND cause problems in dep |
| 6 |
> resolution? Would there be a way to prevent the contents of these |
| 7 |
> files from being added for packages that are themselves in these |
| 8 |
> files? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Did you miss the part about RESTRICT=system-deps? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> How is the "system" set constructed from these files? Would they |
| 13 |
> simply be concatenated (minus duplicates) and treated like the old |
| 14 |
> "packages" file (minus the magic visibility filtering)? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Maybe, we'd have to see what works best. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Marius |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 24 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives