1 |
On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 10:31 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, everyone. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I've been thinking about this for some time already, and the recent |
5 |
> FILESDIR mess seems to confirm it: I'd like to start a more stable LTS |
6 |
> branch of Portage. |
7 |
> |
8 |
|
9 |
I think this is healthy for most software projects, but two things |
10 |
stand out to me for portage specifically: |
11 |
|
12 |
1. Most portage users can fake this already by telling portage to |
13 |
accept only stable keywords for sys-apps/portage. I know it's not |
14 |
exactly the same, but it provides many of the same benefits. |
15 |
|
16 |
2. What happens to the LTS branch when the next EAPI is released? |