| 1 |
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 01:00:37PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> Your change will match any TERM value that starts with 'st', which seems |
| 3 |
> too loose. How about if we match st-256color instead? |
| 4 |
> -- |
| 5 |
> Thanks, |
| 6 |
> Zac |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Yes, you're right, though there's still one more issue with that. |
| 10 |
Although st-256color seems to be the default $TERM value for st (it is |
| 11 |
on my system and I don't recall changing it), there are a few other |
| 12 |
terminfo entries for st: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
$ ls -lah /usr/share/terminfo/s/st* |
| 15 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2,2K Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st |
| 16 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2,4K Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st-16color |
| 17 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2,3K Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st-256color |
| 18 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 856 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st52 |
| 19 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2,0K Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st52-color |
| 20 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st52-m -> st52 |
| 21 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 562 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/st52-old |
| 22 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/stterm -> st |
| 23 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/stterm-16color -> st-16color |
| 24 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/stterm-256color -> st-256color |
| 25 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 916 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/stv52 |
| 26 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 848 Dez 1 14:23 /usr/share/terminfo/s/stv52pc |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Maybe we should be using the 'stterm' symlinks instead? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Regards, |
| 32 |
Christoph |
Archives