| 1 |
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:59:42 +0200 (CEST) |
| 2 |
"Matthias Waechter" <matthias@××××××××××××.at> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > Brian Harring wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>>Where do you get the filename from if not SRC_URI? |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> Additional metadata tagged in, or mangling of the syntax in some |
| 8 |
> >> way. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I don't want to imagine how ugly that will get, syntax mangling will |
| 11 |
> > probably break things and additional metadata needs a way to |
| 12 |
> > properly map entries. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> SRC_URI="rename:${PN}-${PV}.tar.bz2:http://and-so-on/" |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> or add some slashes after rename to fit whatever slashy syntax. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Breaks anything that assumes that SRC_URI is actually a (list of) URI. |
| 19 |
fetch() might not be so hard to adjust, but there are many more tools |
| 20 |
involved. Not a good idea to change semantics of established |
| 21 |
datastructures (especially if it's only a workaround for broken |
| 22 |
upstream packages). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Marius |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 30 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives