| 1 |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:13:01PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:59:42 +0200 (CEST) |
| 3 |
> "Matthias Waechter" <matthias@××××××××××××.at> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > > Brian Harring wrote: |
| 6 |
> > >>>Where do you get the filename from if not SRC_URI? |
| 7 |
> > >> |
| 8 |
> > >> Additional metadata tagged in, or mangling of the syntax in some |
| 9 |
> > >> way. |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > I don't want to imagine how ugly that will get, syntax mangling will |
| 12 |
> > > probably break things and additional metadata needs a way to |
| 13 |
> > > properly map entries. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > SRC_URI="rename:${PN}-${PV}.tar.bz2:http://and-so-on/" |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > or add some slashes after rename to fit whatever slashy syntax. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Breaks anything that assumes that SRC_URI is actually a (list of) URI. |
| 20 |
> fetch() might not be so hard to adjust, but there are many more tools |
| 21 |
> involved. Not a good idea to change semantics of established |
| 22 |
> datastructures (especially if it's only a workaround for broken |
| 23 |
> upstream packages). |
| 24 |
EAPI change... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
/me goes back to what he was doing and leaves people to come up with a |
| 27 |
sane proposal |
| 28 |
~harring |
Archives